Julie ([info]jooley_ann) wrote,
@ 2007-05-10 16:18:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:attachment, johanna

JoJo News
Some recent developments in JoJo Land.

First, she's started extending her arms fully to mean, "Pick me up!"  Well, sometimes it seems to mean that, anyway.  It definitely means, "I don't like my current status.  Change it!"  It's mighty cute.

This afternoon, I was changing her and I took a break in the middle of everything to wash my hands.  She was left waiting for the diaper.  (She's right there next to the sink -- don't worry, she's wayyyyy too wiggly to be left unattended.)  So she got impatient, extended her arms, and I said, "Oh honey, Mama is washing her hands, and anyway you still need a diaper."  She gave up.  Then a few seconds later, she peed everywhere.  So...okay.  If I'd have picked her up, she'd have peed on me!  Humph!

Second, the naps are going much better now that I'm darkening her room. SO much so that today she slept TOO long for her morning nap.  I went up after 2 1/4 hours, and she was still snoozing.  So I opened the blinds.  Nada.  So I made some quiet noise.  Nope.  I waiting 5 minutes and went back.  Zzzzzz.  Finally I just had to gently wake her. 

The result?  She was an hour late going down for her second nap, and boy was she hard to put down.  However, in the plus column, I successfully for the first time "wore her down."  And the nice thing about the sling I use is that it can be unfastened and slipped out from under her, so I can gently ease her out of it, hold her a bit longer, and then lay her in her crib.  But man, I had to use the paci and everything.  She did not want to nap, even though she was tiiiiired.

I've been inspired to start using the sling more.  I went for awhile without it.  Partially I stopped using it b/c it was so challenging to keep a newborn in a sling.  They're uncoordinated and you really have to keep a hand on them at all times.  Partially it was the baby blues, when I stopped doing a lot of things for no good reason.  (Tho' one thing I stopped doing when I had the baby blues was watching TV.  Like, nowadays I never turn the TV on.  Ever.  It's not like I was watching a ton -- it was just a snippet of Law & Order now & again on Tivo -- but we've moved into a totally TV-free zone.  I'm really pleased about that.)  (Oh, John & I watch Tivo'd stuff after JoJo goes to bed, but that's different.  And actually, we're so far behind on SG-1, SG-Atlantis, and House that TV watching has almost become a chore.  Huh!)

But back to the sling.  Today I took it with me to Babies R Us, and Johanna loooooved it.  She was completely patient while I shopped for a swim diaper for her.  Found an adorable one (photos coming).  I need it for two reasons.  First, John and I are going on a little getaway this weekend to San Antonio.  We're staying here.  Happy anniversary / Mother's Day to me!  Second, I plan to take the YMCA class for itty-bitty swimmers later this summer, when Johanna is old enough.  They require a swim diaper.

QUESTION:  Do you think it's weird to put your baby girl in just a swim diaper?  (Mind you, it's frilly & purple with butterflies on the butt.  And a matching sun hat.)  Or, do you think it's weird to put your baby girl in a bikini?  I'm from the latter school.  A 6-month old in a bikini reeeeally kinda bugs me.  But, being new to parenting, I have no clue what our culture's attitude is towards these things.  Thoughts out there?

OK.  Last but not least, I think I'm gonna pick up one of these kinds of slings, too.  For when JoJo gets older.  Her current sling is wonderful, but it's not going to support her for much longer.  The Ergo looks to be exactly what I need for when she's a litte tyke.  Which seems like it's coming much faster than I ever imagined....




(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Bikinis
(Anonymous)
2007-05-10 09:34 pm UTC (link)
Well I'm a dad and I'm old school so take it as you will but wife-Emily agrees with me:
1. No bikini for Frances (age 7). She wants one but absolutely not. We relented with a tankini but that fully covers her middrift.
2. No pierced ears until she's (ahem) a woman.

There is waaaay to much blurring of sexuality lines for girls. No sense in participating in this system. Kids should be kids, not nymphettes.

Like I said, I'm old school.
Mike

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Bikinis
(Anonymous)
2007-05-10 09:53 pm UTC (link)
OK...this seems weird to me that buying a bikini for your daughter would be taboo. I'm pretty liberal, but quite conservative when it comes to kids, and I think there are some pretty grown up looking bikinis out there (I've almost copied and emailed out the babygap.com website start page with a baby girl on it in a slinky croched grownup looking bikini top and it looks padded...it's absolutely crazy). But I am surprised anyone would think there is anything sexual at all about a regular old baby or kid's bikini. See the ones at Lands End, for instance? There's no need for it for a baby...swim diapers are great. But at four, it's mostly what I buy. Have you ever tried taking a little girl to the bathroom (port o) at the beach or a pool? It is a nightmare to get a wet one piece down and up. Besides, the lines get blurred only if you let them get blurred...I don't think wearing a bikini blurs them at all, especially a cute gingham one or a Minnie Mouse one. How could that be considered sexual, ore even weird, at all? Doesn't have to be all or nothing, I think! -Kim

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Bikinis
[info]jooley_ann
2007-05-10 10:13 pm UTC (link)
I think I'm with Mike on this one, to some degree.

For the wee ones, I feel like a little girl should be able to run around in just her bottoms 'til she's school aged. There are plenty of photos of me in a diaper or undies up 'til about age 4 or 5. So...same goes for a swimsuit, eh?

When they get older, hmmmm. Like you said, Kim, some of them are slinky...and to me that's creepy!

I dunno. I guess I'm old fashioned too. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Bikinis
(Anonymous)
2007-05-10 10:47 pm UTC (link)
I hear you on the sans top thing...I'm first generation American on one side and that is quite the norm. However, we do live in a country that is still arguing over if it's OK for women to breast feed in public. Good luck taking your four five year old girl to a public pool or the beach without a top. As a side note, I don't think nowadays you will be able to process photos of a child over a year old without a swimsuit top. I think there are some laws in place about that now. Maybe that's why there are soooo many bikinis around for babies now? People want the comfort of a swim diaper but feel they have to cover the top. Oh, and I think the slinky bikinis for baby girls are meant to be like a mohawk or a Pink Floyd t-shirt for a baby boy. They are meant to get a little mini me chuckle from friends and family...but, some of the baby girl bikinis are way over the top (good intentions gone bad). Wait til you see some of the shoes they're making for four year olds! Heels galore!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Bikinis
[info]jooley_ann
2007-05-11 01:54 am UTC (link)
Ugh. The thing about the photos is just depressing. I think it's terribly sad if one has to start training their girls to cover up on top before they have even the vaguest clue as to why on earth anyone would care. They're *children*, for heaven's sake.

Having lived overseas as a kid and then again relatively recently (Dresden in 00-01), I learned that the more you see *normal* bodies in all states of dress and undress, the more realistic your own body image becomes, and the less sexualized the human body is. It's just *so* much of a healthier attitude.

*sigh*

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-05-11 12:04 am UTC (link)
I think that just a swim diaper would be fine. She is a baby. But I have seen bikinis that are cute and quite childlike but I have also seen way too many that look like a string bikini and/or are way, way too mature - i.e. sexual. And that just makes me super uncomfortable. - Marsha

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jooley_ann
2007-05-11 01:54 am UTC (link)
Yah, I'm getting ready to post an image that Kim sent me. Ugh.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-05-11 12:40 am UTC (link)
I was anti-bikini, thinking they were weird for babies, but then when I went shopping I realized I could either pay $14 for the one-piece, then $6 more for the swim diaper or I could pay about $12 for a two-piece that had the swim diaper included. So my desire to be cheap won out. Also, there was a matching sunhat. And as Tim pointed out to me, Stella's little baby belly poking out will be sooooo cute! But I definitely saw some baby swimsuits that seemed "sexy" and all wrong to me. And the one poster's point about two pieces being much easier for bathroom visits is a really good one.

-Julie

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jooley_ann
2007-05-11 01:56 am UTC (link)
Well, you know, some of the bikinis were cute enough. But, like you said, some of them are just so alarmingly grown up.

I dunno. I just feel like, after shopping for swim suits today, this whole "raising a girl" thing is going to be wayyyy more challenging than I realized.... :)

PS -- About the one-piece thing...whatever happened to just yanking the suit to one side...? I guess that's for older kids who are more coordinated?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2007-05-11 02:34 am UTC (link)
At this age, mine is still just coordinated enough to hold herself on the potty...so maneuvering -- her or me -- to move it to the side is still challenging!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…